TRANSIT SONGS and driving songs have been updated. Please let me know what else I need to include in these. Any great lyrics you know?
Transit songs, Another One Rides the Bus
Driving songs, They Paved Paradise and Put up a Parking Lot
Monday, August 21, 2006
Saturday, July 22, 2006
RTD has had private contractors running many of their routes since May 1988. The legislation requiring this was originally sponsored by Bill Owens, before he was elected Governor of Colorado. Ostensibly, it was supposed to make RTD more efficient by adding competition to the bus lines. What it really did was to eliminate Union jobs and move that money to foreign corporations, paying much lower wages to the workers.
I am the first to admit that any company that exists without competition needs to have outside action to shake them up every so often. That applies especially to a bureaucracy, it even applies to a Union. I know this sounds vaguely Republican, but it is true. The problem lies in just what the results of the action are. If the desired action of the privatization law was to lower the wages of bus drivers, then it has succeeded. If the desired action was to make bus service more efficient in Denver then it has failed.
Efficient bus service means buses on time, serving the needs of all the public, and providing a pleasant trip for all. The RTD mission statement is "To meet our constituents' present and future public transit needs by offering safe, clean, reliable, courteous, accessible and cost-effective service throughout the district."
Statistics on the private contractors are very hard to come by. We do not know how RTD decides or counts the complaints or problems that exist. When asked, the management line is that private contractors provide service very comparable to RTD routes. The statistics they release show that private contractors are only slightly worse than in-house routes.
But as one who takes the complaints over the phone, I can tell you that the private contractors are much worse for running on-time, bus break-downs, driving incidents, and courtesy. I personally think that if RTD were to treat their divisions as they treat private contractors, then they would have better statistics to report.
The riding public is aware of the differences. They report "that bus is always late," meaning any time of the day or night. On some routes, people have quit complaining because it just never changes. Recently, RTD has been providing the private contractors with newer buses (apparently because newer contractors were smart enough to insist). That has improved matters greatly, since they do not have to rely on their underpaid mechanics to maintain the buses.
One of the public's biggest complaints is that "the drivers don't speak English." Bus drivers are required to call out the stops where another bus is connecting, and to communicate with passengers on ADA issues, etc. RTD assures us that all contractors are required to hire only drivers fluent in English for this reason.
There are not many private contractors running our fixed-route buses. There are only three companies that are able to run the routes, and historically each company before them has gone away, often because of their own management problems. There don't seem to be any other companies anywhere in the US who can take over the routes, so it isn't really free competition to speak of. The current companies running 50% of RTDs routes are:
... Laidlaw: Originally a Canadian Company, Laidlaw emerged from a bankruptcy in 2003 as Laidlaw International. Now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, They own Greyhound.
... First Transit: First Transit is owned by FirstGroup plc, a British Corporation. They are the United Kingdom's largest bus operator.
... Veolia: Currently changing their name from Connex, they are a French company. Since their acquisitions of Connex and ATC, they have become the largest private transportation company in the U.S.
... I will have more about these Contractors later.
Cal Marsella, RTD CEO, has stated several times recently that he would like to privatize more of RTD, including the Light Rail. When you think about it, what he is really saying is that he does not want to run transportation services. He wants to only run the administration services. In fact, he could privatize administration services too; that might be more to the point of privatizing. I guess that would put him out of a job too, though.
I am the first to admit that any company that exists without competition needs to have outside action to shake them up every so often. That applies especially to a bureaucracy, it even applies to a Union. I know this sounds vaguely Republican, but it is true. The problem lies in just what the results of the action are. If the desired action of the privatization law was to lower the wages of bus drivers, then it has succeeded. If the desired action was to make bus service more efficient in Denver then it has failed.
Efficient bus service means buses on time, serving the needs of all the public, and providing a pleasant trip for all. The RTD mission statement is "To meet our constituents' present and future public transit needs by offering safe, clean, reliable, courteous, accessible and cost-effective service throughout the district."
Statistics on the private contractors are very hard to come by. We do not know how RTD decides or counts the complaints or problems that exist. When asked, the management line is that private contractors provide service very comparable to RTD routes. The statistics they release show that private contractors are only slightly worse than in-house routes.
But as one who takes the complaints over the phone, I can tell you that the private contractors are much worse for running on-time, bus break-downs, driving incidents, and courtesy. I personally think that if RTD were to treat their divisions as they treat private contractors, then they would have better statistics to report.
The riding public is aware of the differences. They report "that bus is always late," meaning any time of the day or night. On some routes, people have quit complaining because it just never changes. Recently, RTD has been providing the private contractors with newer buses (apparently because newer contractors were smart enough to insist). That has improved matters greatly, since they do not have to rely on their underpaid mechanics to maintain the buses.
One of the public's biggest complaints is that "the drivers don't speak English." Bus drivers are required to call out the stops where another bus is connecting, and to communicate with passengers on ADA issues, etc. RTD assures us that all contractors are required to hire only drivers fluent in English for this reason.
There are not many private contractors running our fixed-route buses. There are only three companies that are able to run the routes, and historically each company before them has gone away, often because of their own management problems. There don't seem to be any other companies anywhere in the US who can take over the routes, so it isn't really free competition to speak of. The current companies running 50% of RTDs routes are:
... Laidlaw: Originally a Canadian Company, Laidlaw emerged from a bankruptcy in 2003 as Laidlaw International. Now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, They own Greyhound.
... First Transit: First Transit is owned by FirstGroup plc, a British Corporation. They are the United Kingdom's largest bus operator.
... Veolia: Currently changing their name from Connex, they are a French company. Since their acquisitions of Connex and ATC, they have become the largest private transportation company in the U.S.
... I will have more about these Contractors later.
Cal Marsella, RTD CEO, has stated several times recently that he would like to privatize more of RTD, including the Light Rail. When you think about it, what he is really saying is that he does not want to run transportation services. He wants to only run the administration services. In fact, he could privatize administration services too; that might be more to the point of privatizing. I guess that would put him out of a job too, though.
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
Don't Cross the Solid White Line -
The solid white line is there for a reason: wait till you are past the solid line before you change lanes. Think about it: you are going around somebody you can go around a little later, and irritating all kinds of people when you do it.
Don't Drive Next to a Bus -
or a truck, they cannot see you! They have an extended blind spot. Remember your blind spot? Many people have forgotten about them. Drivers of most large vehicles have the ability to detect a vehicle driving next to them with electronics, but don't take a chance! drop back behind them or go around them!
The solid white line is there for a reason: wait till you are past the solid line before you change lanes. Think about it: you are going around somebody you can go around a little later, and irritating all kinds of people when you do it.
Don't Drive Next to a Bus -
or a truck, they cannot see you! They have an extended blind spot. Remember your blind spot? Many people have forgotten about them. Drivers of most large vehicles have the ability to detect a vehicle driving next to them with electronics, but don't take a chance! drop back behind them or go around them!
Thursday, June 01, 2006
SPEEDING ON I-25
Now that T-Rex has some nice wide lanes and smooth driving, the traffic has edged up, up, up. Driving through what used to be the narrows, we now go fast, fast, fast. Faster than the normal 10-miles-an-hour-over-the-speed-limit. I guess it's true, the nicer the road the faster we will go. I always have to get out of the left lane if I only want to go 65 now.
THE REAL SPEED LIMIT seems to be 10 over the posted limit. I used to think it was maybe 20% over, but now people go 45 in a 35 zone, 65 in a 55. Apparently only a school zone or a police car can make us go anywhere close to the speed limit.
Now that T-Rex has some nice wide lanes and smooth driving, the traffic has edged up, up, up. Driving through what used to be the narrows, we now go fast, fast, fast. Faster than the normal 10-miles-an-hour-over-the-speed-limit. I guess it's true, the nicer the road the faster we will go. I always have to get out of the left lane if I only want to go 65 now.
THE REAL SPEED LIMIT seems to be 10 over the posted limit. I used to think it was maybe 20% over, but now people go 45 in a 35 zone, 65 in a 55. Apparently only a school zone or a police car can make us go anywhere close to the speed limit.
Thursday, May 04, 2006
Suggest Some Good Transit Songs
*********
I'm making a list of driving songs and transit songs.
Click on the link to see the lyrics.
TRANSIT SONGS:
Another one Rides the Bus - Weird Al Yankovic
Bus Stop
Charlie on the M.T.A. - Kingston Trio
Chattanooga Choo Choo - Glen Miller
Down by the Station
Gone to Look for America - Simon and Garfunkel
The Magic Bus - The Who
Swing Low Sweet Chariot
To Morrow - Kingston Trio
Waitin for the Bus - Z.Z. Top
The Wheels on the Bus go Round and Round - for kidspage.
PLEASE send me your suggestions to (EMail address): DrivingDenver at aol.com
DRIVING SONGS,
Baby You Can Drive My Car - The Beatles
Beep Beep - The Playmates
Cross Town Traffic - Jimi Hendrix
Dead Man's Curve - Jan and Dean
Fun Fun Fun - Beach Boys
G.T.O. - Ronny and the Daytonas
Hey Little Cobra - The Rip Chords
Hot Rod Lincoln - Commander Cody and His Lost Planet Airmen
Seven Little Girls Sitting in the Back Seat Kissing and Hugging with Fred - Curls?
Little Deuce Coop - Beach Boys
Little Old Lady from Pasadena - Jan and Dean
Maybelline - Chuck Berry
Me and Bobby McGee - Janis Joplin
409 - Beach Boys
No Particular Place to Go - Chuck Berry
They Paved Paradise - Joni Mitchell
Shut Down - Beach Boys
Surf City - Jan and Dean
Taxi - Harry Chapin
What else? (This list was originally started April 14, 2006)
*********
I'm making a list of driving songs and transit songs.
Click on the link to see the lyrics.
TRANSIT SONGS:
Another one Rides the Bus - Weird Al Yankovic
Bus Stop
Charlie on the M.T.A. - Kingston Trio
Chattanooga Choo Choo - Glen Miller
Down by the Station
Gone to Look for America - Simon and Garfunkel
The Magic Bus - The Who
Swing Low Sweet Chariot
To Morrow - Kingston Trio
Waitin for the Bus - Z.Z. Top
The Wheels on the Bus go Round and Round - for kidspage.
PLEASE send me your suggestions to (EMail address): DrivingDenver at aol.com
DRIVING SONGS,
Baby You Can Drive My Car - The Beatles
Beep Beep - The Playmates
Cross Town Traffic - Jimi Hendrix
Dead Man's Curve - Jan and Dean
Fun Fun Fun - Beach Boys
G.T.O. - Ronny and the Daytonas
Hey Little Cobra - The Rip Chords
Hot Rod Lincoln - Commander Cody and His Lost Planet Airmen
Seven Little Girls Sitting in the Back Seat Kissing and Hugging with Fred - Curls?
Little Deuce Coop - Beach Boys
Little Old Lady from Pasadena - Jan and Dean
Maybelline - Chuck Berry
Me and Bobby McGee - Janis Joplin
409 - Beach Boys
No Particular Place to Go - Chuck Berry
They Paved Paradise - Joni Mitchell
Shut Down - Beach Boys
Surf City - Jan and Dean
Taxi - Harry Chapin
What else? (This list was originally started April 14, 2006)
Sunday, April 30, 2006
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
DON'T DRIVE IN THE LEFT LANE.
DON'T DRIVE IN THE RIGHT LANE.
Some pet peeves when driving on the highway:
The left lane should be for passing if you can manage it. Leave it open for those idiots who are always running late.
The right lane should be for entering and exiting the highway, or for slow moving traffic. Really, get out of the way there too!
People who drive faster than me are jerks.
People who drive slower than me are idiots.
People who drive the same speed as me are really the worst of all.
DON'T DRIVE IN THE RIGHT LANE.
Some pet peeves when driving on the highway:
The left lane should be for passing if you can manage it. Leave it open for those idiots who are always running late.
The right lane should be for entering and exiting the highway, or for slow moving traffic. Really, get out of the way there too!
People who drive faster than me are jerks.
People who drive slower than me are idiots.
People who drive the same speed as me are really the worst of all.
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
RTD Welcomes us back!
The RTD blog on paper, the Monday Morning Q, is RTD manager Cal Marsella's communications with his employees.
Cal, You do a great job speaking and writing to us. You are really excellent at promoting your point. The only error that I saw was your implying that the RTD Board of Directors was being attacked by the union. Far from it, we found that the Board was very enlightened. They have said they would make sure future negotiations go much smoother.
As you might expect, most of the employees I spoke with did not change their views after reading your defense. It was nice of you to admit that you based our raises on selected average wages in the region, and the high raises of upper management were based on national or international wages. I hope that in the future you at least base our wage raises on comperable cities: cities where the cost of living and inflation rates are similar. Maybe you could even use cities in states where there are no right-to-work-for-less laws. The lack of such a law in Colorado helps to keep the average wages in Colorado well above the states around us.
And by the way, we do support better wages for supervisors and middle management as well.
The RTD blog on paper, the Monday Morning Q, is RTD manager Cal Marsella's communications with his employees.
Cal, You do a great job speaking and writing to us. You are really excellent at promoting your point. The only error that I saw was your implying that the RTD Board of Directors was being attacked by the union. Far from it, we found that the Board was very enlightened. They have said they would make sure future negotiations go much smoother.
As you might expect, most of the employees I spoke with did not change their views after reading your defense. It was nice of you to admit that you based our raises on selected average wages in the region, and the high raises of upper management were based on national or international wages. I hope that in the future you at least base our wage raises on comperable cities: cities where the cost of living and inflation rates are similar. Maybe you could even use cities in states where there are no right-to-work-for-less laws. The lack of such a law in Colorado helps to keep the average wages in Colorado well above the states around us.
And by the way, we do support better wages for supervisors and middle management as well.
Monday, April 10, 2006
The RTD strike is over.
On April 7, 2006, ATU 1001 Union members voted to return to work. The proposal brought a good raise in contributions for our Health Insurance. It passed by 81%, though there was still considerable disgruntling about the lack of respect.
I was originally going to say that nobody won in the strike, and that is true (as is true of every strike), but perhaps I can put a positive swing on it: everybody won something.
RTD won their $200,000 extra pay for every day we were out. RTD was also able to save face by maintaining their budget: still a $1.80 raise over 3 years. And hopefully they won because they can now improve their dialogue with the union.
Union members won because we helped lower our out-of-pocket Health Insurance contributions, and we did get a higher raise up front. We won because we saw very gracious customers supporting us, and thanking us for returning so soon. We won because the RTD Board members learned that they were kept in the dark during negotiations, and they will insist on better communications in the future. They, after all, are supposed to be the ones running the company. We also got free coffee and doughnuts when we returned to work.
Governor Bill Owens won with the the memorable quote that will secure his place in history: "This union reminds me of the youngster who murders his parents and then throws himself on the mercy of the court because he's now an orphan." Only a lame duck politician could compare 1750 of his constituents to murderers.
The Transit-Riding public won with new appreciation of what the RTD employees do for them. Thank you very much for your support! We hope to never allow you to be put out again.
On April 7, 2006, ATU 1001 Union members voted to return to work. The proposal brought a good raise in contributions for our Health Insurance. It passed by 81%, though there was still considerable disgruntling about the lack of respect.
I was originally going to say that nobody won in the strike, and that is true (as is true of every strike), but perhaps I can put a positive swing on it: everybody won something.
RTD won their $200,000 extra pay for every day we were out. RTD was also able to save face by maintaining their budget: still a $1.80 raise over 3 years. And hopefully they won because they can now improve their dialogue with the union.
Union members won because we helped lower our out-of-pocket Health Insurance contributions, and we did get a higher raise up front. We won because we saw very gracious customers supporting us, and thanking us for returning so soon. We won because the RTD Board members learned that they were kept in the dark during negotiations, and they will insist on better communications in the future. They, after all, are supposed to be the ones running the company. We also got free coffee and doughnuts when we returned to work.
Governor Bill Owens won with the the memorable quote that will secure his place in history: "This union reminds me of the youngster who murders his parents and then throws himself on the mercy of the court because he's now an orphan." Only a lame duck politician could compare 1750 of his constituents to murderers.
The Transit-Riding public won with new appreciation of what the RTD employees do for them. Thank you very much for your support! We hope to never allow you to be put out again.
Saturday, April 08, 2006
How RTD Employees ended up striking
On March 29, 2006, RTD presented a modified proposal to the Union. The terms were somewhat improved, but it was not really much of a movement from the proposal that was rejected by 95% on March 26. To stress the importance of the matter, the Union notified RTD that we would strike on April 3 if there was no contract. The Union Executive Board suggested the members approve this proposal, since nobody wants to go through a strike, and because the Health & Welfare fund was in jeopardy if a prolonged strike would come about.
A Union is the most democratic institution there is. Everything that is done, every decision, every penny spent, has to be approved by the membership. This isn't just a Representative Democracy, it is a true Democracy. The company was aware of this, but they still did not heed the Union's warnings when we asked for more money up front, and more for health insurance. (See my previous posting.) You could say we were pushed. And in fact the Colorado Department of Labor had set up a link for RTD employees to apply for unemployment insurance. They believed we would qualify as being locked out.
The Union members rejected the proposal, though not by a large majority. I believe the members voting against it had simply reached the end of the rope when it came to being abused. Raymond Hogar, a Professor of Management at CSU, says unions seldom strike for just money, they strike out of principle.
RTD set a certain amount they would spend on their union employees, disregarding the tremendous raises they had given to top managers during our wage freeze. They never moved from this amount. Even during the strike, they took out a $500,000 contract to "protect their property." Since RTD's main income is from sales tax revenues, they received an extra net income of $200,000 per day because they did not have to pay us. That is well over 1 million dollars a week, according to RTD spokesman Scott Reed. (Reed's salary had gone up 31% to over $118,000.) The union certainly did not want to strike, only RTD could come out ahead.
That is why we had wanted binding arbitration from the beginning. The people who suffered from the strike were the Riders and the Union Members. And when you consider how many handicapped people, elderly people, poor people, children and just plain commuters it affected, you have to ask: why didn't RTD consider those people?
RTD said that they didn't want binding arbitration because the last time they were forced into it, they had to pay more than what they had budgeted. The Union proposed that any reasonable person looking at the facts would have given us a reasonable contract.
Looking at the Blogs and other comments, it is easy to see who supports Management regardless of the facts (and who supports Labor regardless of the facts, for that matter.) Those who call for privatizing the rest of RTD don't know that RTD already has a lot of trouble hiring enough drivers and mechanics, and as the economy improves they will find themselves facing the same for all the lower-paid employees as well.
The private carriers pay less than RTD (especially considering health insurance), but they don't force their drivers to work hundreds of hours without days off. RTD Manager Cal Marsella says that if they didn't have to force overtime from the bottom, it would work better. But the truth is that, most of the time, ALL the bus drivers who schedule their days off during the week will be forced to do overtime nearly EVERY DAY. That is how you end up with bus drivers who work for long periods without any days off. They have split shifts that force them to be at work for 12 or more hours to get 8 hours of pay.
I think that if RTD treated their employees a little better, encouraging an occasional day off and treating sick people to sick pay, it would go a long ways towards solving any problems they may think they have.
On March 29, 2006, RTD presented a modified proposal to the Union. The terms were somewhat improved, but it was not really much of a movement from the proposal that was rejected by 95% on March 26. To stress the importance of the matter, the Union notified RTD that we would strike on April 3 if there was no contract. The Union Executive Board suggested the members approve this proposal, since nobody wants to go through a strike, and because the Health & Welfare fund was in jeopardy if a prolonged strike would come about.
A Union is the most democratic institution there is. Everything that is done, every decision, every penny spent, has to be approved by the membership. This isn't just a Representative Democracy, it is a true Democracy. The company was aware of this, but they still did not heed the Union's warnings when we asked for more money up front, and more for health insurance. (See my previous posting.) You could say we were pushed. And in fact the Colorado Department of Labor had set up a link for RTD employees to apply for unemployment insurance. They believed we would qualify as being locked out.
The Union members rejected the proposal, though not by a large majority. I believe the members voting against it had simply reached the end of the rope when it came to being abused. Raymond Hogar, a Professor of Management at CSU, says unions seldom strike for just money, they strike out of principle.
RTD set a certain amount they would spend on their union employees, disregarding the tremendous raises they had given to top managers during our wage freeze. They never moved from this amount. Even during the strike, they took out a $500,000 contract to "protect their property." Since RTD's main income is from sales tax revenues, they received an extra net income of $200,000 per day because they did not have to pay us. That is well over 1 million dollars a week, according to RTD spokesman Scott Reed. (Reed's salary had gone up 31% to over $118,000.) The union certainly did not want to strike, only RTD could come out ahead.
That is why we had wanted binding arbitration from the beginning. The people who suffered from the strike were the Riders and the Union Members. And when you consider how many handicapped people, elderly people, poor people, children and just plain commuters it affected, you have to ask: why didn't RTD consider those people?
RTD said that they didn't want binding arbitration because the last time they were forced into it, they had to pay more than what they had budgeted. The Union proposed that any reasonable person looking at the facts would have given us a reasonable contract.
Looking at the Blogs and other comments, it is easy to see who supports Management regardless of the facts (and who supports Labor regardless of the facts, for that matter.) Those who call for privatizing the rest of RTD don't know that RTD already has a lot of trouble hiring enough drivers and mechanics, and as the economy improves they will find themselves facing the same for all the lower-paid employees as well.
The private carriers pay less than RTD (especially considering health insurance), but they don't force their drivers to work hundreds of hours without days off. RTD Manager Cal Marsella says that if they didn't have to force overtime from the bottom, it would work better. But the truth is that, most of the time, ALL the bus drivers who schedule their days off during the week will be forced to do overtime nearly EVERY DAY. That is how you end up with bus drivers who work for long periods without any days off. They have split shifts that force them to be at work for 12 or more hours to get 8 hours of pay.
I think that if RTD treated their employees a little better, encouraging an occasional day off and treating sick people to sick pay, it would go a long ways towards solving any problems they may think they have.
RTD STRIKE, how it started
On March 26, 2006, the Union ATU Local 1001 voted to reject RTD's "Last, Best, and Final Offer."
The following letter to RTD was written on March 28, 2006. It tells the reasons for wanting a better contract. It shows some of the disrespect we received: while managers received raises averaging $9,000.00, we had no raises at all.
We need a raise now.
In 2003 we believed you when you said the company could not afford raises, so we took a wage freeze.
In those 3 years, we have lost nearly 10% of our buying power due to inflation. The inflation rate in 2005 was about 3.4%.
The company has gained by that inflation (and by the improved economy) with increased sales tax revenues.
Your proposal of 15 cents a quarter will just about keep up with inflation in the next 3 years, but does nothing for the problems we have accumulated. Our credit card balances will never recover.
You may think we make a good living, but things have changed. The median income in Colorado is over $40,000 a year (for a single wage-earner family). What cost $1 in 1968 is now $5.
We need affordable health insurance.
Before 2003, we paid $66 a month for health insurance.
Even at the current rate of $190 a month, there are many people in our lower-paid group who cannot afford it.
You know that the rate will rise dramatically this year, and the next years as well. We need to provide our families with health insurance we can afford.
We are dependant on you to maintain our families.
On March 26, 2006, the Union ATU Local 1001 voted to reject RTD's "Last, Best, and Final Offer."
The following letter to RTD was written on March 28, 2006. It tells the reasons for wanting a better contract. It shows some of the disrespect we received: while managers received raises averaging $9,000.00, we had no raises at all.
We need a raise now.
In 2003 we believed you when you said the company could not afford raises, so we took a wage freeze.
In those 3 years, we have lost nearly 10% of our buying power due to inflation. The inflation rate in 2005 was about 3.4%.
The company has gained by that inflation (and by the improved economy) with increased sales tax revenues.
Your proposal of 15 cents a quarter will just about keep up with inflation in the next 3 years, but does nothing for the problems we have accumulated. Our credit card balances will never recover.
You may think we make a good living, but things have changed. The median income in Colorado is over $40,000 a year (for a single wage-earner family). What cost $1 in 1968 is now $5.
We need affordable health insurance.
Before 2003, we paid $66 a month for health insurance.
Even at the current rate of $190 a month, there are many people in our lower-paid group who cannot afford it.
You know that the rate will rise dramatically this year, and the next years as well. We need to provide our families with health insurance we can afford.
We are dependant on you to maintain our families.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)